现有技术抗辩的对比标准  

Comparison Standard of Prior Art Defence

作　　者：翟文峰[1] 张炳生[1] 

机构地区：[1]宁波大学法学院,浙江宁波315211

出　　处：《中国矿业大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第3期52-59,88,共9页Journal of China University of Mining & Technology(Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金项目(项目编号:06BFX039)

摘　　要：现有技术抗辩是指,被控侵权人针对专利权人的侵权指控,可以提出自己使用的技术是现有技术,以对抗权利人的侵权指控进而主张不侵犯权利人专利权的行为。学者们提出的对比标准学说均存在一定的问题。新颖性判断与相同侵权之间不存在合乎逻辑的一致性,创造性与等同侵权在主观上、主体上是相同的,厘清这些关系是构建对比标准的基础。现有技术抗辩应该采纳等同的标准,它具有法理基础、现实依据和立法依据。Prior art defence is an act that the accused infringer who confronts the alleged infringement can defend himself against the accusation by arguing that what he uses are prior arts to counteract the alleged infringement of the rightful owners and then he will be judged to do no infringements.Theories of comparison standard that scholars propose remain problematic.Judgment of novelty is logically different from identical infringement.Inventiveness is same as equivalent infringement in subjectivity and subject.To understand their relations is the foundation of construction of comparison standards.Prior art defence system should adopt equivalence standard,as it is based on jurisprudence,reality and laws.

关 键 词：现有技术抗辩 新颖性 创造性 等同的标准 

分 类 号：D923.424[政治法律—民商法学]