检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈勇[1]
机构地区:[1]广东外语外贸大学,广州510420
出 处:《广东外语外贸大学学报》2010年第5期81-83,共3页Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
摘 要:历史上的国家安全模式有三种:个体安全模式、集团安全模式、集体安全模式。在最为人们熟知的联合国集体安全制度之前,基于特定的历史背景,欧洲协调时期已经存在集体安全制度的国际实践。在击败拿破仑之后,欧洲列强通过《神圣同盟宣言》和四国集团(后为五国集团)建立了欧洲的集体安全制度,并通过国际会议来协调欧洲的国际关系。不管欧洲协调时期的政治基础和实际目的如何,它的安全模式已经具备了集体安全制度的基本特征,应是国际社会对集体安全制度的第一次尝试。There are three kinds of mode on national security in history: individual, bloc and collective security mode. The UN collective security system is the most well-known. Prior to that, under the specific historical background, Europe had established and practiced a collective security system in the period of European coordination. After the defeat of Napoleon, with the "Sacred Union Manifesto" , the European powers established a collective security system with the Group of Four (later the Group of Five), and coordinated the European intemational relations through the international conferences. Whatever the political foundation and practical purposes in that period, the security mode as such already showed the basic characteristics of collective security system. Hence, it should be deemed as the first attempt to set up a collective security system in the international community.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15