检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽医科大学第二附属医院康复医学科,合肥230601
出 处:《中华物理医学与康复杂志》2010年第9期667-671,共5页Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
基 金:基金项目:安徽省科技厅计划内年度重点项目(07021002),安徽省高校自然科学研究项目[(教育厅皖北产学研)KJ2008A097]
摘 要:目的 探讨中文简体版恐惧-回避信念问卷(FABQ-CHI)对评估下背痛患者的信度、效度及测量反应性.方法 结合英文版和香港繁体版FABQ,按一定要求得到FABQ-CHI.使用FABQ-CHI、36项简化版健康调查问卷(SF-36)、中文版Oswestry功能障碍指数(CODI)及11分疼痛评定量表(NRS)对门诊和住院治疗的下背痛患者在第1次就诊时进行评估,2 d后进行第2次FABQ-CHI的评定.结果 FABQ-CHI具有良好的内容效度、复测信度(r=0.809~0.810,P〈0.01)、分半信度(r=0.696),内部一致性系数0.857,与NRS、SF-36、CODI比较显示有显著的相关性(FABQ-CHI-NRS:r=0.303;FABQ-CHI-SF-36(physical):r=-0.350;FABQ-CHI-SF-36(mental):r=-0.308;FABQ-CHI-CODI:r=0.488,P〈0.01).通过因素分析的方法分离出三个因子,累积贡献率为61.2%.结论 FABQ-CHI是一种可靠的下背痛评估工具,它有良好的信度和效度.Objective To translate a fear-avoidance belief questionnaire and explore the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Chinese version for evaluating patients with lower back pain. Method The original ques- tionnaire translated into Chinese (the FABQ-CHI) was administered to inpatients and outpatients who also completed a medical outcomes 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) , the Chinese version of Oswestry' s disability index (CODI) , and an H-point pain numerical rating scale (NRS). Two days later, the outpatients were asked to com- plete the questionnaire again. About one to two weeks later, the inpatients were cvaluated again. Results The FABQ-CHI had very good content validity, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0. 809 and 0. 696 and a Cronbach's alpha of 0. 857. Spearman's correlation coefficients between the FABQ-CHI and the NRS, the CODI, the SF-36 (physical) and the SF-36 (mental) were 0. 303, 0. 488, - 0. 350 and -0. 308 respectively. Factor analysis yielded three factors which accounted for 61.2% of the total response vari- ance. Conclusions The FABQ-CHI is a valid and reliable evaluating tool for patients with lower back pain. It has been shown to demonstrate very good content validity, a high degree of test-retest reliability and internal consistency, and good construct validity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.127