检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:于风华[1,2] 孟庆跃[1] 王健[1] 逯延华[1] 王镇[1]
机构地区:[1]山东大学卫生管理与政策研究中心,济南250012 [2]山东省卫生厅,济南250014
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2010年第10期67-70,共4页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:山东省自然科学基金资助项目(ZR2009HM028);山东省医药卫生科技发展计划资助项目(2009HZ075)
摘 要:卫生总费用已成为国内外开展卫生政策分析和评价的重要工具。目前,我国公布的是筹资来源法的核算结果(政府卫生支出、社会卫生支出和居民个人现金卫生支出),国际上公布的是筹资机构法的核算结果(广义政府卫生支出和私人部门卫生支出)。为避免国内外开展政策分析时因引用数据带来的偏差,需要对我国和国际卫生总费用分类方法和指标口径进行比较研究。文章描述了国际卫生总费用(筹资机构法)核算指标分类口径,梳理了我国卫生总费用(筹资来源法)核算指标分类口径,并对国内外卫生总费用核算指标进行了对比衔接,最后利用主要指标对卫生政策进行了简要分析评价。Total health expenditure has become an important tool in health policy analysis and evaluation at home and abroad.At present,China’s estimating results published derive from the accounting method of financing sources,which includes government health appropriation,social health expenditure and out-of-pocket health expenditure.The international estimating results published derive from the accounting method of financing agents,which includes general government health expenditure and private health ex-penditure.In order to reduce the bias caused by the difference of reference data for policy analysis,the indicators classification be-tween Chinese and international health expenditure are comparatively analyzed.Firstly,the indicators classification of international health accounts(financing agent)is described.Then the indicators classification of national health accounts(financing sources)in China is depicted,and the difference of domestic and foreign health expenditure indicators is compared.Finally,the health policy with the key indicators of total health expenditure is analyzed and evaluated.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.70.193