略谈宋代官窑瓷器研究中存在的问题  

Some Issues on Guan Wares of the Song Dynasty

作　　者：吕成龙[1] 丁银忠[2] 

机构地区：[1]故宫博物院古器物部 [2]故宫博物院文保科技部

出　　处：《故宫博物院院刊》2010年第5期6-15,共10页Palace Museum Journal

摘　　要：宋代官窑是中国古陶瓷研究中的重要内容之一。长期以来,由于对相关历史文献的理解不同以及考古发掘的局限性,致使在宋代官窑瓷器研究中存在许多悬而未决的问题,诸如何为北宋官窑,北宋朝廷是否在都城汴京设置过官窑,北宋官窑是否就是汝窑,河南汝州张公巷窑是否是北宋官窑,南宋修内司官窑的称谓是否准确,南宋官窑是否只有郊坛下官窑一处,何为文献上所说的内窑,老虎洞窑是修内司官窑还是文献上所说的续窑,等等。本文在对专家学者们对上述问题的看法进行疏理的基础上,指出对宋代官窑瓷器的研究离不开传世宋代官窑瓷器、现代科学技术手段和考古发掘资料,只有将这三者结合起来开展综合研究,才能最终解决上述问题。The Song-dynasty Guan ware is among the important contents in study of Chinese ancient ceramics,but there remain many open issues owing to different interpretation of the historical documents and limitations of archaeological excavations such as: What was the Guan kiln of the Song dynasty like? Was it true that the Northern Song imperial court set up Guan kiln in the capital of Bianjing? Was the Guan kiln of the Northern Song dynasty Ru kiln? Was Zhanggongxiang kiln in Ruzhou of Henan the Guan kiln of the Northern Song dynasty? Is it an appropriate title of Xiuneisi klin for the Southern Song dynasty? Was Jiaotanxia kiln the only one in the Southern Song dynasty? What was Nei kiln like in history? Was Laohudong kiln Xiuneisi klin or Xu kiln based on the records? etc.As a result of the textual research of what mentioned above,this paper proposes that these issues should be settled on the basis of the synthetical study of the Guan wares of the Song dynasty together with the modern science and technology and archaeological data as well.

关 键 词：宋代官窑 北宋官窑 南宋官窑 修内司窑 郊坛下官窑 内窑 续窑 张公巷窑 老虎洞窑 故宫博物院古陶瓷研究中心 

分 类 号：K876.3[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]