检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何晓燕[1] 赵国秋[1] 曹日芳[1] 汪永光[1] 石志道[1]
机构地区:[1]杭州市疾病预防控制中心,浙江杭州310021
出 处:《中国健康教育》2010年第10期745-748,共4页Chinese Journal of Health Education
基 金:杭州市科技发展计划项目(2005633Q05)
摘 要:目的了解中学生心理健康状况与应对方式之间的相关关系,为中学生心理健康教育提供参考。方法采用分层随机整群抽样方法,对1584名中学生进行中国中学生心理健康量表和中学生应对方式量表测试,以典型相关分析探讨两组变量之间的关系。结果心理健康状况与应对方式的第一典型相关系数为0.648(P<0.01),累积贡献率为71.826%。典型变量U1主要反映情绪应对维度的发泄情绪(-0.866)、幻想/否认(-0.794)、忍耐(-0.545)、逃避(-0.552)4个因子;典型变量V1在心理健康量表的10个因子上的负荷较均匀,可以综合概括心理健康状况。结论中学生越是采用情绪应对的方式,心理健康状况越差。针对性的心理健康教育应以改变情绪应对的方式为主。Objective To explore the relationship between mental health variables and coping style variables of middle school students,and to provide the basis on mental health education for middle school students.Methods Using stratified random cluster sampling,1584 middle school students were selected to undergo the Mental Health Inventory of Middle School Students and the CopingStyle Scale for Middle School Students,and the relationship between mental health and coping style of the students was analyzed with the method of canonical analysis.Results The first canonical correlation coefficient was 0.648(P0.01),whose cumulative percentage was 71.826%.For the coping style variables,U1 loaded heavily on abreaction(-0.866),denial and fantasy(-0.794),restraint(-0.545),and escape(-0.552).For the mental health variables,V1 loaded well on all the ten factors.Conclusion The canonical analysis indicated that the more emotionally the students coped,the poor the mental health status of the students were.Mental health education of middle school students should focus on training their coping skills,especially on reforming the negative emotion-focused coping.
分 类 号:R193[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.48