中国能源生态足迹与能源生态补偿的测度  

Measurement of Energy Ecological Footprint and Eco-compensation,China

作　　者：薛晓娇[1] 李新春[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国矿业大学管理学院,江苏徐州221116

出　　处：《技术经济与管理研究》2011年第1期90-93,共4页Journal of Technical Economics & Management

摘　　要：本文从探求中国能源可持续消费出发,运用生态足迹模型,重点将中国29个行政区域化石能源消费的生态足迹进行了测度,并且进行了横向对比,生态赤字大小的顺序为东部>中部>西部。同时,以生态系统服务和生态足迹的理论和方法为基础,从国家宏观层面建立生态补偿的判定标准、量化模型。在此基础上以中国各省份为例,研究中国区域之间的生态补偿量化问题,建立这种补偿的理论基础并尝试确定补偿的标准。结果显示:有19个省市需要向其他地区支付一定的生态补偿。应支付生态补偿的地区多为东部沿海的经济发达地区,应接受补偿的地区多为较落后的中西部地区。建议国家建立生态补偿基金,协调区域生态服务与生态占用的矛盾。With the exploration of energy sustainable consumption in China as the beginning, the fossil energy consumption of 29 administrative regions in China was estimated through the ecological footprint model （EF） . After the horizontal comparison, we can find that the eastern ecological deficit is the biggest and then the central and the western. Based on the theories and methods of the ecosystem services and ecological footprint, the standard and quantized model for ecological compensation determination was established from the macro level. Taking all the provinces in China as the sample, the study on quantification of eco-compensation among regions in China was put forward in order to establish the theoretical basis for such compensation, which also tries to determine the compensation standards. The results indicate that 19 provinces and cities need to pay a certain ecological compensation to the others. Among the former, mostly are coastal economically developed regions in the eastern and the latter are mostly central and western backward areas. Accordingly, it is suggested that the eco-compensation fund should be established; the inconsistency between ecosystem services and eco-footprint should be coordinated, as well.

关 键 词：能源生态足迹 能源生态服务价值 能源生态补偿 可持续发展 

分 类 号：F205[经济管理—国民经济]