Constitutional limitations of the privacy framework advanced in Eisenstadt v. Baird and Roe v. Wade  

作　　者：Nancy Pietroforte 

机构地区：[1]Rockland Community College, State University of New York, NY 10901, U.S.A.

出　　处：《US-China Law Review》2010年第7期40-47,共8页美中法律评论（英文版）

摘　　要：This paper examines the role of framing in advancing a progressive sexual and reproductive rights agenda. U.S. Supreme Court decisions including Griswold v. Connecticu and Eisenstadt v. Baird helped establish legal precedent invoking a ＂privacy framework＂ for subsequent cases including Roe v. Wade （as well as Doe v. Bolton and, more recently, Lawrence v. Texas）. This paper highlights the limitations of the privacy framework while exploring more potentially efficacious frames.

关 键 词：ABORTION constitutional issues Eisenstadt v. Baird gender Griswold v. Connecticut privacy reproductive rights Roe v. Wade 

分 类 号：TU375.4[建筑科学—结构工程] D921[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]