检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张灼赞[1] 邹蔼珍[1] 郁相云[1] 梁高明[1] 庞惠民[1] 陈静[1] 陈洁锋[1] 钟建华[1]
机构地区:[1]深圳市龙岗中心医院药剂科,深圳市518116
出 处:《中国药房》2010年第41期3931-3933,共3页China Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:了解深圳市某区医疗中心门/急诊处方质量和合理用药情况。方法:以《处方管理办法》、《中国药典·临床用药须知》为依据,对2009年1至12月抽取的8400张处方进行合理性分析。结果:书写不规范处方451张(5.4%),主要为缺漏项;不合理用药处方314张(3.7%),主要表现在用药疗程过长、无适应证用药、超范围使用抗菌药等;人均用药品种为2.30种,药品通用名应用率为98.6%,基本药物应用率为87.0%,注射剂应用率为21.6%,抗菌药物应用率为36.4%,人均药费为122.21元。结论:该院门/急诊处方规范书写和合理用药水平有待提高,需要进一步干预。OBJECTIVE:To probe into the quality of prescriptions and rational use of drugs in outpatient/emergency departments of a regional medical center in Shenzhen.METHODS:According to Prescription Administration Regulation and Instruction for Clinical Drug Use of Chinese Pharmacopeia,8 400 prescriptions of outpatient/emergency departments were collected from the hospital during Jan.~Dec.2009 to analyze the rationality of them.RESULTS:The writing of 451 prescriptions was irregular(5.4%),mainly such as missing items;unreasonable drug use was found in 314 prescriptions(3.7%),such as long medication period,medication without indication,application of antibiotics beyond demand.2.30 kinds of drugs were used per patient on average;the application rate of general names of drugs was 98.6%;the application rate of essential drugs was 87.0%;the application rate of injections was 21.6%;the application rate of antibiotics was 36.4%;the per capita drug cost was 122.21 yuan.CONCLUSION:The writing of prescription and rational use of drugs in outpatient/emergency departments of the hospital should be improved.Further interventions are necessary.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15