浅析我国国际商事仲裁临时措施的决定权分配  

作　　者：严红[1] 张洁[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江工商大学法学院,浙江杭州310018

出　　处：《特区经济》2010年第10期244-246,共3页Special Zone Economy

基　　金：2009年杭州市社科基金项目(PR90900126)资助

摘　　要：国际商事仲裁中临时措施的决定权分配问题,国际上通行做法是赋予仲裁庭和法院在一定情况下享有决定权。通过对国际上关于该问题三种立法模式的分析,指出我国现有立法中存在的问题,并提出我国应采用当事人自由选择的立法模式,同时将该措施的最终决定权赋予法院。For the question of the allocation of the decision-making power of the interim measures in international commercial arbitration,international common practice is giving the arbitral tribunal and the court the decision-making power under certain circumstances.Through the analysis to the three kinds of international legislative models about this question,this paper pointed out the problems in the Chinese current legislation,and put forward that the Chinese legislation should adopt the legislative model of the parties freely choosing,and at the same time,give the court the final decision-making power of the measures.

关 键 词：国际商事仲裁临时措施决定权 法院 仲裁庭 

分 类 号：D997.4[政治法律—国际法学]