检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]解放军302医院病毒性肝炎研究室,北京100039 [2]以岭药业集团,河北石家庄050035 [3]解放军总医院药材处,北京100853
出 处:《中国药物应用与监测》2010年第5期261-262,278,共3页Chinese Journal of Drug Application and Monitoring
摘 要:目的:评价恩替卡韦与阿德福韦酯治疗核苷初治的慢性乙型肝炎的不良反应发生率。方法:检索2003年1月–2010年5月公开发表的恩替卡韦每天0.5mg与阿德福韦酯每天10mg治疗核苷初治的慢性乙型肝炎(疗程≥48周)的随机对照临床研究。采用χ2检验分析研究间的异质性,以相对危险度为疗效分析统计量进行合并分析并绘制森林图。结果:最终纳入1篇英文文献,4篇中文文献。分析结果显示,恩替卡韦治疗组和阿德福韦酯治疗组12周和48周时不良反应发生率的差异无统计学意义(P值分别为0.50和0.92)。结论:恩替卡韦和阿德福韦酯治疗核苷初治的慢性乙型肝炎的不良反应发生率相似。Objective:To evaluate the incidence rate of adverse effects induced by entecavir and adefovir dipivoxil in nucleoside-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B.Methods:Randomized controlled clinical trials published between January 2003 and May 2010 about comparison of efficacy between entecavir and adefovir dipivoxil in nucleoside-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B were searched.The dosages of entecavir and adefovir dipivoxil were 0.5 mg each day and 10 mg each day respectively,and the courses of treatment were no less than 48 weeks.Heterogeneity was examined by Chi-square test,the relative risk was calculated and forest-graph was drawn.Results:One English article and four Chinese articles were included.Results of meta analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence rate of adverse effect at 12 weeks(P = 0.50) and 48 weeks(P = 0.92) between the entecavir group and adefovir dipivoxil group.Conclusion:There was similar incidence rate of adverse effect between entecavir and adefovir dipivoxil in nucleoside-naive patients with chronic hepatitis B.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117