检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈莉娟[1] 蔡罡[1] 余杰[1] 陈龙[1] 潘竟军[1]
机构地区:[1]新疆油田公司采油工艺研究院
出 处:《油气田环境保护》2010年第B10期23-24,共2页Environmental Protection of Oil & Gas Fields
摘 要:火驱作为稠油热采的有效接替技术,与注蒸汽开采技术相比,具有采收率高,能耗低,CO_2排放少的优势。文章从火驱驱油机理特征阐述了火驱与注蒸汽技术的不同点,从燃料开采能耗、热效率、注入剂资源、数据对比四个方面分析火驱比注蒸汽热效率高,无燃料开采成本,能耗是注蒸汽的50%;从CO_2气体排放方式和排放量对比可知,火驱能够减少温室气体排放,为油田节能减排、环保生产起到积极作用。Compared with steam injection technique,fire flooding,an effective replacement technique of heavy oil thermal recovery,has a variety of advantages,e.g.high recovery efficiency,low energy consumption,less CO_2 emissions,etc.this article expounds the differences between fire flooding and steam injection from the characteristics of fire flooding mechanism.Furthermore from the aspects of energy consumption of fuel extraction,thermal efficiency,injection agent resources and data comparison,it finds out that fire flooding has higher thermal efficiency,no need for fuel extraction cost and its energy consumption is only 50%of steam injection.From the comparison of CO_2 emission patterns and total quantity,fire flooding can reduce green house gas emissions and play an active role in energy-saving and emission-reducing as well as environment-friendly production in oilfield.
分 类 号:TE345[石油与天然气工程—油气田开发工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7