子宫三角形切除术与常规半切除术效果的对照观察  

The Comparative Investigation of Triangular Hysterectomy and Classical Hysterectomy

作　　者：王仲兰[1] 高企贤[1] 郭成秀[1] 王彦莹[1] 朱颖军[1] 李桂兰[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津市中心妇产科医院,300052

出　　处：《天津医药》1999年第6期349-350,共2页Tianjin Medical Journal

摘　　要：目的　通过对子宫三角形切除术（１组）与常规子宫半切除术（２组）的对照研究，探讨两种术式各自的优势和临床实用价值。方法：两组各１２例，年龄、术前诊断、盆腔情况相似具有可比性。１组行子宫三角形切除术，２组行常规子宫半切除术，对手术时程、术中出血量和术后恢复情况进行对照观察。结果：１组较２组手术时程短、术中出血少、术后离床活动时间早（Ｐ＜０．０１），同时１组术式保留了双侧子宫动脉，维持了卵巢原有的血供途径，并保存了子宫及卵巢周围支持组织的解剖结构完整。结论：子宫三角形切除术设计合理，技术新颖，操作简便，出血少，术程历时短，相对安全且病人痛苦小，值得推广。Aims:To investigate the advantages of triangular sub-abdominal hysterectomy(TH)by comparing it with classical subabdominal hysterectomy(CH). Method: The patients were divided into two groups, each 12 patients. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups on patients age, diagnosis before operation and pelvic examination findings. Patients treated with TH were compared with those treated with CH on the process of operation, loss of blood and recovery time after the operation. Results:The time of operation in TH group was significantly shorter than CH group, as well as the loss of blood and the recovery time. The uterus and surrounding tissues of the ovary had no changes because of remaining of the bilateral uterine arteries. Conclusions: The triangular sub-abdominal hysterectomy had the advantages of simplicity, little loss of blood, shorter operation time and better safety.

关 键 词：子宫切除术 三角形切除术 常规切除术 对比研究 

分 类 号：R713.42[医药卫生—妇产科学]