检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:屈水令[1,2] 袁霖[1] 黄洋[1] 徐维四[1] 余小玲[1] 刘玉磊[1] 邢辉[1] 邵一鸣 马丽英[1]
机构地区:[1]中国疾病预防控制中心性病艾滋病预防控制中心病毒免疫室传染病预防控制国家重点实验室,北京102206 [2]中国疾病预防控制中心教育培训处,102206
出 处:《中华预防医学杂志》2010年第11期985-988,共4页Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine
基 金:基金项目:国家重点基础研究发展计划(2005CB523103);国家自然科学基金(30872232);国家科技重大专项(2008ZXl001-013,2008ZXl001-004)
摘 要:目的调查HIV-1感染人群抗病毒治疗后HIV-1辅助受体的利用情况。方法从安徽、河南两地选择109例接受抗病毒治疗的HIV-1感染者和45例未接受抗病毒治疗的HIV-1感染者作为研究对象,通过周围血单个核淋巴细胞(PBMCs)共培养方法,分离培养HIV-1临床毒株,利用酶联免疫吸附法检测培养上清HIV-1的P24含量,通过表达趋化因子CCR5和CXCR4的Ghost细胞系检测病毒辅助受体利用,对治疗人群中HIV-1辅助受体利用因素进行探讨,并与治疗因素进行分析讨论。结果从治疗人群中分离了45株病毒,其中22株病毒(48.89%)利用CCR5辅助受体,是R5嗜性毒株;21株病毒(46.67%)利用CXC4/CCR5辅助受体,为双嗜性(X4/R5)毒株;有2株(4.44%)仅利用CXCR4辅助受体,为x4嗜毒株。从未治疗人群中分离了109株病毒,其中96株(88.07%)利用CCR5辅助受体(R5嗜性毒株);13株(11.93%)为X4/R5双嗜性毒株。HIV-1CXC4/CCR5辅助受体利用率在两组中的差异有统计学意义(χ^2=27.30,P〈0.05)。治疗方案一(齐多夫定、去羟肌苷、奈韦拉平三联用药)治疗后HIV-1CXCA/CCR5的利用率为59.09%(13/22),治疗方案二(司他夫定、去羟肌苷、奈韦拉平三联用药)治疗后HIV-1CXCA/CCR5的利用率为43.48%(10/23),二者对HIV-1辅助受体利用的影响差异没有统计学意义(χ^2=1.10,P=0.30)。结论在HIV-1感染者中,接受抗病毒治疗人群中HIV-1CXCR4/CCR5利用率高于未治疗人群。Objective To investigate HIV-1 co-receptor usage in patients experienced anti-retroviral therapy (ART) in Anhui and Henan province of China. Methods A total of 45 HIV-1 infected individuals who have experienced ART and I09 un-experienced ART patients from Anhui and Henan province,which were called as treatment group and treatment-negative group, were selected as study subjects. HIV-1 strains were isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of whole blood from patients. HIV-1 p24 in the culture supernatant was measured using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay(ELISA) kit. HIV-I co- receptor usage was identified using Ghost cell lines expressing CD4 and the chemokine receptor CCR5 or CXCR4. Results Among 45 HIV strains from the treatment group,22 (48.9%) strains used CCR5 as a co- receptor (R5 tropic strain),21 (46. 7% ) strains used CXCR4/CCR5 as a co-receptor (X4/R5 duel tropic strain) ,and 2(4. 4% ) used only CXCR4 as a co-receptor(X4 tropic strain). In 109 strains from treatment- negative group,96 (88. 1% ) strains used CCR5 as a co-receptor(R5 tropic strain),13( 11.9% ) strains used CCRS/CXCR4 as a co-receptor use (X4/R5 strain ). A significant difference was found between two groups in X4 co-receptor usages(χ^2= 27.30, P 〈 0. 05 ). Furlhermore, after treated with AZT + DDI + NVP, the HIV-l CXC4/CCR5 utilization was 59. 09% ( 13/22), meanwhile after treated with D4T + DDI + NVP, the HIV-1 CXCA/CCR5 utilization was 43.48% (10/23),which the difference was not statistical significant ( χ^2 = 1. 10, P = O. 30). Conclusion HIV-1 CXCRd/CCR5 co-receptor utilization was higher in ART patients than treatment-negative patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145