罪名确定模式的困境与超越  

The Dilemma in Our Deterministic Model of Charge and Beyond

作　　者：张利平[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学,北京100088

出　　处：《山西省政法管理干部学院学报》2010年第4期48-50,共3页Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators

摘　　要：罪名及罪名确定的合理界定是研究罪名确定模式的理论平台。我国采取以默示型为原则,以明示型为例外的罪名确定模式。为了弥补默示型罪名确定模式的缺陷,"两高"通过罪名司法化推动罪名的规范和统一,但是,罪名司法化模式不仅面临理论上的质疑,在实践中也存在罪名滞后、罪名冲突和罪名偏离的困境。罪名立法化的成功转型是回应理论质疑和突围实践困境的利器。The reasonable definition of Charges and determining accusation is theory Platform which is needed for researching deterministic model of charge.In china,The dominating model is implied,express is the exception type. To make up for defect of the implied mode,The supreme people＇s court and The supreme people＇s procuratorate promote charges’unity and norm through the Charges of judicialization.This method is not only faced with theoretical doubt,but also confronted with practical confusion which cover charges lagging、charges conflict and charges deviation.The successful transformation from Charges of judicialization to Charges of legislation is the best method to break Current predicament.

关 键 词：罪名 确定模式 罪名立法化 罪名司法化 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]