检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李玉翠[1] 王茹玲[1] 吴垠[2] 程红萍[1] 赵玉锦[1] 杨璐[1] 张亚琴[1] 刘佳[1]
机构地区:[1]山西省长治医学院附属和平医院护理部,046000 [2]华南师范大学心理系
出 处:《中华健康管理学杂志》2010年第5期272-274,共3页Chinese Journal of Health Management
摘 要:目的 调查长治市老年人居家照顾者的生存质量,并分析其影响因素,探索适合本地区老年人照顾者的支持模式.方法 以长治市老年人居家照顾者为研究对象,使用生存质量量表SF-36、老年人自理能力量表ADL进行入户问卷调查,对调查数据进行统计学分析.结果 居家照顾者生存质量得分在72.1~117.0之间者占98.8%,不同自理能力老年人居家照顾者生存质量总分及8个维度得分差异均有统计学意义(P均〈0.05).居家照顾者健康状况及老年人自理能力对居家照顾者生存质量的8个维度均有影响,年龄、性别、文化程度、婚姻状况及经济收入分别对居家照顾者生存质量的各维度有不同程度的影响,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05).结论 居家照顾者生存质量处于中等水平.自理能力正常老年人的居家照顾者生存质量明显高于自理能力缺陷者.居家照顾者健康状况及老年人自理能力是主要的影响因素,应针对性的采取多种干预措施,不断提高居家照顾者的生存质量.Objective To investigate the quality of life of elderly caregivers and its factors. Methods Elderly caregivers living in Changzhi City were enrolled in this study. 36-item short-form (SF-36) health survey and Activity of Daily Living Scale ( ADL) were used as study tools. The data was analyzed by statistical description,t test or multiple regression. Results Those with score of quality of life reaching 72. 1 to 117. 0 accounted for 98. 8%. The total score and score of eight dimensions of SF-36 showed statistically significant difference between different daily living activity groups ( P 〈 0.05) . The state of health and self-care ability of the elderly imposed a major impact on eight dimensions of SF-36. Age, sex, level of education, marital status and wage had different impact on each dimension of SF-36. Conclusion The quality of life of elderly caregivers is at a medium level. The main factors of quality of live of elderly caregiver are their state of health and self-care ability of the elderly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249