检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省成都市第三人民医院耳鼻咽喉科,四川成都610031
出 处:《吉林医学》2010年第27期4665-4666,共2页Jilin Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:探讨药物、高压氧、卡波金治疗突发性耳聋的疗效。方法:将126例突聋患者按入院顺序随机分为单纯药物治疗组40例(40耳),高压氧联合药物治疗组42例(44耳),卡波金联合药物治疗组44例(46耳),对三组疗效进行比较。结果:单纯药物治疗组疗效低于高压氧联合药物治疗组和卡波金联合药物治疗组,且比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);高压氧联合药物治疗组和卡波金联合药物治疗组有效率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:药物配合高压氧或卡波金的综合治疗是突发性耳聋治疗的有效方法,可根据患者具体情况进行选择。Objective To discuss the effectiveness of medicine,hyperbaric oxygenation and Carbogen in the treatment of sudden hearing loss.Methods 126 sudden hearing loss patients were divided into simple medicine treatment group(40 cases,40 ears),HBO combined medicine treatment group(42 cases,44 ears)and Carbogen combined medicine treatment group(44 cases,46 ears) according to the order of been hospitalized.Results The effectiveness of simple medicine was lower than HBO combined medicine and Carbogen combined medicine treatment and the differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05);there was no difference between HBO combined medicine and Carbogen combined medicine (P〈0.05).Conclusion Medicine combined HBO or Carbogen is effective for the treatment of hearing loss and should be selected according to the condition of the patients.
分 类 号:R764.437[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.144.163