检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]瑞安市中医院内科,浙江省瑞安325200 [2]温州市第二人民医院呼吸科
出 处:《中国基层医药》2010年第20期2783-2784,共2页Chinese Journal of Primary Medicine and Pharmacy
摘 要:目的 观察微管置管胸腔闭式引流治疗结核性胸腔积液的疗效及其安全性.方法 64例结核性胸腔积液患者均分成传统治疗组(对照组)和微管闭式引流组(治疗组),每组32例.对照组按常规给予间断、定量抽液法治疗.治疗组予微管胸腔闭式引流.结果 两种治疗方法均能有效减少胸腔积液,但治疗组显效率明显高于对照组(P<0.05),同时胸膜反应减少,费用降低(P<0.01).结论 微管闭式引流具有疗效好,费用低,并发症少和患者乐于接受等优点,可降低医疗风险.Objective To observe the effect and safety of pleural effusion treated by closed thoracic drainage with micro-catheter. Methods A total of 64 cases with pleural effusion were randomly divided into conventional therapy group ( control group ) and closed thoracic drainage with micro-catheter group ( treatment group) , each group including( 32 cases ). Control group were treated with drainage of thoracic puncture interruptedly while treatment group treated by closed thoracic drainage with micro-catheter. Results Both two therapeutic methods could reduce pleural effusion, but obvious effective rate of treatment group was higher than that of control group( P < 0.05 ). Meanwhile, the rate of pleural reaction and treatment cost in treatment group were lower than that in control group. Conclusion Closed thoracic drainage with micro-catheter was effective, lower treatment cost and lower complications. Moreover, it could reduce medical risk.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46