论独立教唆犯之犯罪预备性——以我国刑法第29条第2款的规定为视角  

On the Crime Pattern of Independent Abetment Crime

作　　者：朱道华[1] 

机构地区：[1]佛山科学技术学院,广东佛山528000

出　　处：《行政与法》2010年第10期107-111,共5页Administration and Law

基　　金：2010年教育部人文社科青年基金项目"教唆犯研究";2009年广东省高校优秀青年创新人才培育项目"教唆犯相关问题研究"阶段性成果

摘　　要：独立教唆犯是预备犯,这是因为,从教唆行为的本质上看,教唆行为是教唆者所教唆之罪的犯罪预备行为,且这种犯罪预备行为的本身在法律上不具有正当性。为了尽早阻断教唆行为对法益的破坏作用,有的国家在刑法总则中对独立教唆犯予以原则性地处罚规定,采取的是非独立预备犯的立法模式,将犯罪构成要件的可罚性前置化。采取独立预备犯立法技术的国家,在刑法分则中为一些独立教唆行为规定了特定的犯罪构成要件,使一些教唆行为成为其相应的犯罪构成要件的实行行为,但不是教唆者所教唆之罪的犯罪实行行为。The independent abetment crime is a form of Preparatory crime.From the essence of abetting acts,abetting acts are preparation acts for the crime abetted by the abettor,and such a crime act in itself does not have legal legitimacy.To block the early damage of the abetting acts,Some countries commit non-independent model legislation and provide punishment principle in the General Provisions of the Criminal Code,some other countries commit independent model legislation and provides specific elements of crime for some abetting acts,therefor,some abetting acts are corresponding implement acts of crime,but not the implement acts of crime for Abetted by instigator.

关 键 词：独立教唆犯 预备犯 立法模式 

分 类 号：D924.399[政治法律—刑法学]