检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]扬州大学法学院,江苏扬州225009 [2]北京化工大学北方学院,北京101601
出 处:《行政与法》2010年第10期120-124,共5页Administration and Law
摘 要:专利权人或独占实施的被许可人不正当行使其权利、不实施其专利、利用其优越地位不正当地限制交易、或采取不公正的交易方法造成他人利益或公共利益受到损害的,构成专利权滥用。我国法律、法规没有对专利权滥用行为进行界定,强制性法律规范不健全,缺乏具有操作性的救济措施,对其规制的措施尚不够有力。同时执行机构多元化,执法程序不够完善,导致执法不统一。在专利权滥用法律规制模式上,我国宜采用二元制的规制模式。If the patentee or the licensee of exclusive exploitation of patent exercises his patent right improperly,does not implement his patent or makes use of his advantageous position to limit the transactions improperly or adopt unfair methods of the transactions,which cause damage to other people's interests or public interests,their actions have constituted the patent right abuse.However,our laws and regulations have not defined the abuse of patent right and the compulsory norm of law is insufficient.Besides,the laws and regulations regulating patent right abuse lack maneuverable remedial measures and the regulatory measures are not yet forceful.At the same time,the law enforcement agency is also diverse and the law-enforcing procedure is not perfect,giving rise to the disunity of the system of law enforcement.With the modes of regulation against the abuse of patent right,it is the best choice to establish a dual regulatory mode for China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.201.156