检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:荣晓红[1]
机构地区:[1]最高人民检察院法律政策研究室,北京100726
出 处:《华北电力大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第4期48-55,共8页Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences)
摘 要:我国民事诉讼结构理论研究存在一些不足,我们要正确认识。民事诉讼社会性的增强、民事诉讼模式论研究的启示和我国民事司法环境现状存在的缺陷都表明,我国民事诉讼一审普通程序的诉讼结构,应当是以法院和当事人以及双方当事人之间的协作互动为基础、以检察院专门监督为保障的放射状诉讼结构。这种诉讼结构为我们正确认识我国民事诉讼基本法律关系,推动我国民事诉讼制度的完善和我国民事检察事业的进一步发展提供了理论指导。There exist some demerits in the theory research of China's civil litigation structure,and our correct recognization is needed.The civil litigation socialities swelling,the civil litigation model research's inspiring,as well as the limitation existing among China's civil judicial environmental actualities,make it known as it should be that China's civil litigation structure about the ordinary procedure of first instance,should be made up on the base of cooperation and exchange activities between the courts and the litigants,along with the two parties,and should be made impersonal,impartial and effective with the procuratorates special supervising,it is just like a composition of actinomorphic picture in the process of the litigation.This kind of civil litigation structure supplies us the correct theoretical guidance to recognize correctly the basic litigation connections,to perfect our China's civil litigation systematical provisions and impulse our China's civil prosecuting cause for the more.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200