检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012 [2]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875
出 处:《法制与社会发展》2010年第6期81-87,共7页Law and Social Development
基 金:司法部国家法制与法学理论研究项目"传统的慎刑观与死刑控制"(06SFB2024)
摘 要:唐代的死刑适用相对于其他朝代比较克制。法律观念对死刑适用的影响不容低估。慎刑观念主张"惟刑之恤";公平观念倡导"平恕无私"、"宽严得中,刑当其罪的理念";礼刑迭相为用观念则强调斟酌情理,结合礼刑,因时制宜。这些法律观念,不论是对于司法官员,还是对于最高统治者,都是一种约束力量,一定程度上影响着唐代刑法的运行轨迹,影响着唐代死刑适用的状况。In Tang Dynasty,death penalty was more cautiously used than other Dynasties. This is due to fewer provisions on death penalty in legislation,as well as the impact on the application of death penalty in legal notions. The notion of cautious punishment asked for a limit of criminal law and criminal punishment; the notion of fairness engaged in a impartial system which are not so swear as well as not so merciful. The notion of mix application of ceremonies and penalties reminded the officials to consider on the combination of ceremonies and criminal punishment. All these notions formed a limit force for the judicial officers and the sovereign,and influenced the application of death penalty in Tang Dynasty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222