检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董一菲[1]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨商业大学法学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150000
出 处:《河北工程大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第3期118-120,123,共4页Journal of Hebei University of Engineering(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:作为合同相对性原则的例外,第三人利益合同现已得到世界各国普遍的承认,其核心在于对第三人权利的认定。但我国《合同法》第64条对此问题的规定却相当模糊。不仅第三人能否取得合同上的权利未能明确,而且条文设计也过于简略,这不符合现代合同法的发展趋势。因此对第三人利益合同中受益第三人的权利进行深入探讨具有重要的理论与实践意义。As an exception of the principle of contract relativity,every country starts to acknowledge contract for the benefits of the third parties one after another,which crisis focuses on the power to the third party.the provision in Article 64 of contract law applied in this problem is considerable obscure.Not only is whether third party can achieve rights under a contract or not ambiguous,but also the design of articles is too sketchy,as swims against the tide of contemporary contract law.Therefore,it has a great significance on the theory and practice to research the right of the third part in the contract for the benefits of the third parties deeply.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7