检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吕长超[1] 樊毫军[2] 丁梦江[3] 赵曙光[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民武装警察部队天津总队医院心理咨询科,天津300162 [2]中国人民武装警察部队总医院科训科 [3]中国人民武装警察部队天津总队四支队
出 处:《中国急救复苏与灾害医学杂志》2010年第11期1033-1034,1050,共3页China Journal of Emergency Resuscitation and Disaster Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨武警官兵面对不同勤务的应对方式、自尊和信任水平及其相关性,为部队开展心理健康教育提供参考。方法采用简易应对方式量表、自尊量表和信任他人量表,对243名担负不同勤务的武警官兵进行心理测试。结果①武警官兵积极应对方式得分显著高于常模组(P〈0.05);消极应对方式得分显著低于常模组(P〈0.05)。②武警官兵面对不同勤务的积极应对方式、自尊和信任水平的差异无统计学意义,消极应对方式差异显著(P〈0.05)。③不同勤务的武警积极应对方式和自尊水平呈显著正相关;消极应对方式和信任水平呈显著负相关;自尊和信任水平呈显著正相关。结论武警官兵面对不同勤务在消极应对方式上存在差异,自尊和信任水平与应对方式的选择有关,应采取针对性干预对策改善其心理健康状况。Objective To explore how soldiers cope with different duties and their self-esteem and trust, furnishing valuable reference to Psychological health education which unfolds in the military. Methods The psychological tests were taken place by adopting scales of SCSQ, SES and TIP forms on 243 soldiers who are on different duties. Results CAPF soldiers received significantly higher scores than the normal group in positive coping strategy, lower scores in negative coping strategy (P〈O.05). No significant difference is shown in soldiers who were on different duties in positive coping strategy, self-esteem and trust, but in negative coping strategy (P〈0.05). The result indicated that self-esteem and positive coping strategy are significantly related, and negative coping strategy and trust level suggest a significant negative relation. Self-esteem and trust level are positively related. Conclusion There is difference in negative coping strategy among the soldiers who are on different duties. It can be improved and even reversed by providing them pertinent intervention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222