国家监护主义的一个窗口——《监护制度比较研究》评  

A Window of National Guardianism——Critiques on"Comparation Study on Guardianship System"

作　　者：魏增产[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京科技大学文法学院,北京100083

出　　处：《北京科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第3期170-172,共3页Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：宏观调控主体具有高位阶性、专业性等特征,受控主体具有较大能动性。宏观调控法律责任主要是程序责任,且其能够获得豁免的空间较大。我国现行宏观调控法律制度具有决策程序不透明、法律责任及其实现机制不充分的缺陷。应通过积极的理念创新和制度创新,实现宏观调控公共实施与个人实施的良性互动。The subject of macro-control has the characteristics of high order,specialty,etc.The legal liability of maro-adjustment and control is mainly process liability,and it has comparatively large immunity space.The current macro-adjustment and control law in China has some drawbacks,such as non-transparent decision process,insufficient legal liability,and so on.Therefore,active idea innovation and system innovation must be carried out to realize optimum interaction of macro-adjustment and control public implementation and individual implementation.

关 键 词：宏观调控法 实施机制 公共实施 个人实施 

分 类 号：D9[政治法律—法学]