检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京政法职业学院,北京100024
出 处:《西南政法大学学报》2010年第5期90-97,共8页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
摘 要:我国《侵权责任法》已经吸纳了精神损害赔偿制度。于制度设计的视野审视,精神损害赔偿之规范安排应当坚持利益衡量的制度进路,在对受害人实施法律救济与保障行为人的行动自由之间,寻求和给定规范路径,在利益冲突的格局中实现各个利益主体之间的利益平衡,实现个案中的实质正义。同时,精神利益的保护是精神损害赔偿的立法着眼点,对精神利益的界定与衡量是精神损害赔偿制度设计的基本价值取向之一。于利益衡量的视域中,即将实施的《侵权责任法》在精神损害赔偿的制度安排上尚存需要完善的空间,需要从利益衡量的角度给予讨论。Compensation for mental injury has already been adopted by the Tort Liability Law of PRC. From the perspective of institutional design, prescribing compensation for mental injury shall insist on the sys- tem of benefit-balance, find a proper way to protect the benefit of both parties in the conflict, namely, carrying legal aid into execution for the victim and safeguarding doers' s freedom, and eventually realize justice. The key to compensation for mental injury is to protect the victim' s mental health, therefore, defining and measur- ing mental health is foundation of the institutional design of compensation for mental injury. The Tort Liability Law to be issued still need to be perfected, and benefit-balance shall also be taken into consideration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117