法律论题学的逻辑基础  

On the Logical Basis of Legal Topics

作　　者：张传新[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学威海分校法学院 [2]南开大学哲学系

出　　处：《山东大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2010年第6期58-63,共6页Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：山东省社会科学研究项目"法律推理的逻辑基础研究"(项目编号07DFXZ05)阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：近现代法学理论的发展揭示法律推理在经典逻辑体系中不能得到很好表达,论题学方法为之提供了一个有益的进路。论题学实质是上基于问题的论辩思维框架,它具有前提的缺省性和开放性、推理机制的弗协调性和实质论辩性、结论的可废止性和似真性特点。法律论题学的逻辑基础是非形式逻辑,它与演绎逻辑不是替代或竞争的关系,而是相互补充的统一关系。论题学方法及其基本思想与现代广义模态逻辑、批判性思维、非形式逻辑理论相契合。The modern legal theory proves that law is not a system of deductive logic aiming for the true, and topic method has been conceived as a useful approach for it. In fact, topics is a sort of thinking framework based on topoi, and is characterized by openness, defeasibility, argumentation, and others. We can not conclude that it has replaced deductive logic, but it is complementary to it. The topic method and its idea can accommodate itself to modern study of modal logic, critical thinking and informal logic. These theories present a new kind of logic basis for topics-oriented legal reasoning.

关 键 词：法律论题学 非形式逻辑 演绎逻辑 

分 类 号：D90-05[政治法律—法学理论]