社会史研究中的区域失衡现象  

The Regional Imbalance Phenomenon in Social History Research

作　　者：吴琦[1] 

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学历史文化学院,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《江西师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2010年第5期172-176,共5页Journal of Jiangxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：华中师范大学"中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"项目"多学科视域下的前近代社会群体研究"(CCNU09C02004)

摘　　要：作为史学前沿,社会史完成了从边缘到主流的转变,代表着史学的发展趋向。然而国内社会史的发展仍存在诸多问题,尤其是研究对象的区域失衡现象,即"优势区域"与"弱势区域"的存在与巨大落差所造成的研究重心的极不平衡,这制约了社会史研究的全局性发展和实质性突破,也影响到社会史研究整体史目标的实现。针对失衡现象,改变与调适十分重要,务使区域社会史的研究能够建立在区域之间的相互观照和互为整体的基础之上。其中,建构区域社会史的研究范式,建立"优势区域"与"弱势区域"的对话机制,建立区域社会史研究的资料系统等皆不失为有效而具体的方法与途径。As the history frontier,social history has transformed from a frontier science to a dominant subject,it represents the development tendency of history. However,there are still many problems in the development of domestic social history,especially the regional imbalance phenomenon of research object,namely the extreme imbalance caused by the existence of ＂regional advantages＂ and ＂regional disadvantages＂ and the great fall,which restricts the whole development and key breakthrough of social history research,and affects the realization of the total history target of social history research. In the light of imbalance phenomenon,change and adjustment are very important,the regional social history research must be based on giving attention to each other between regions and a whole each other,among which establishing the paradigm of regional social history research,the dialogue mechanism between ＂regional advantages＂ and ＂regional disadvantages＂ ,and the information system of regional social history research,etc. are effectively concrete methods and ways.

关 键 词：社会史 区域失衡 优势区域 弱势区域 

分 类 号：K03[历史地理—历史学]