机构地区:[1]中南大学湘雅三医院放射科,长沙410013 [2]湖南师范大学医学院医学影像教研室,长沙410013
出 处:《中南大学学报(医学版)》2010年第10期1064-1072,共9页Journal of Central South University :Medical Science
基 金:湖南省教育厅科研项目(09C628)~~
摘 要:目的:通过对猪腰椎间关节软骨1.5T磁共振(magnetic resonance,MR)多序列成像与大体标本对照的实验性研究,评估MR成像(MR image,MRI)显示腰椎间关节软骨的能力与限度。方法:用Siemens1.5T超导磁共振对6条新鲜离体成年猪腰椎行椎间关节矢状面扫描。扫描序列包括:快速自旋回波T1加权序列(fast spin echo T1-weighted imaging,FSE T1WI)、快速自旋回波T2加权序列(fast spinecho T2-weighted imaging,FSE T2WI)、脂肪抑制质子加权序列(fat saturation proton density-weighted imaging,FS PDWI)、不同反转角的三维快速小角度激发成像序列(three-dimensional fast low angle shot imaging,3D-FLASH)以及不同反转角的水激发三维快速小角度激发成像序列(water excitation three-dimensional fast lowangle shot imaging,WE3D-FLASH)。扫描结束后将标本深低温冷冻,沿椎间关节矢状面正中层面切开,对照观察椎间关节矢状面正中层面大体标本与MRI图像。取6对L3/L4椎间关节矢状面正中层面各序列图像测量并计算软骨的信噪比(signal-noise ratio,SNR)以及软骨与骨皮质、软骨与骨髓、软骨与生理盐水的对比噪声比(contrast-noise ratio,CNR)。以游标卡尺测量6对L3/L4椎间关节软骨矢状面正中层面中心的厚度,与MRI所测量软骨厚度对照。结果:3D-FLASH(FA20°)及WE3D-FLASH(FA20°)序列显示腰椎间关节软骨及周围结构优于其他研究序列,相对FS PDWI序列能更真实地反映腰椎间关节软骨厚度。(1)4种不同反转角(FA10°,FA20°,FA30°及FA40°)3D-FLASH序列比较:3D-FLASH(FA20°)序列图像软骨SNR、软骨与骨皮质CNR最高,与其他3种3D-FLASH序列比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),软骨与骨髓CNR、软骨与生理盐水CNR亦较高。(2)4种不同反转角(FA10°,FA20°,FA30°及FA40°)WE3D-FLASH序列比较:WE3D-FLASH(FA20°)序列图像软骨SNR、软骨与骨皮质CNR、软骨与骨髓CNR最高,与其他3种WE3D-FLASH序列比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),软骨与生理�Objective To evaluate the capability and limitation of magnetic resonance image(MRI)for lumbar zygapophyseal joint cartilage through comparing pig lumbar zygapophyseal joint cartilage acquired from multiple MRI sequences of a 1.5 Tesla MR and gross specimens.Methods Six fresh lumbar spines from adult pigs were sagittaly scanned by Siemens 1.5 Tesla MR. The scan sequences included fast spin echo T1-weighted imaging (FSE T1WI),fast spin echo T2-weighted imaging (FSE T2 weighted T2WI),fat saturation proton density-weighted imaging (FS PDWI),3-dimensional fast low angle shot imaging (3D-FLASH),and water excitation 3-dimensional fast low angle shot imaging (WE 3D-FLASH). Each scan sequence acquired images from the same layer. The signal-noise ratio (SNR) for articular cartilage,contrast-noise ratio (CNR) for cartilage versus bone cortex,cartilage versus bone marrow,and cartilage versus saline were calculated.Right after the scanning,the lumbar spines were snap-frozen,incised sagittally along the midline lumbar zypapophyseal joints,and photographed to compare the gross specimens with corresponding MRIs. The thickness of sagittal midline center of 6 pairs of lumbar(L3/L4)zypapophyseal joint cartilage was measured by vernier caliper. The thickness of the back ventral articular cartilage was added and then compared with corresponding MR images.Results 3D-FLASH(FA 20°)and WE 3D-FLASH(FA 20°) sequences had significant advantages compared with other sequences in imaging lumbar zypapophyseal joint cartilage,and were mostly close to the real thickness.(1) Comparison of the 4 flip angle (FA10°,FA 20°,FA 30°,and FA40°) 3D-FLASH sequences:The highest cartilage SNR and best CNR of cartilage versus bone cortex were both found in the 3D-FLASH(FA 20°) sequence,which was significantly different from the other three 3D-FLASH sequences.The satisfacory CNR of cartilage versus bone marrow,cartilage versus saline were found more in the 3D-FLASH(FA 20°) sequence.(2) C
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...