虚假共犯的可归责性初探  

Preliminary discussion on liability attribution of false accomplice

作　　者：谷芳卿[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学,北京100875

出　　处：《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2010年第4期5-7,共3页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice

摘　　要：虚假共犯的可归责性讨论了行为人假装具有犯罪意图,客观上实施了帮助或者鼓励实行犯的行为,是否能被归责的问题。虚假共犯是否具备共犯的犯罪心态是该问题的核心。美国判例倾向于共犯心态的着力点在对犯罪结果的共同认识。在实用主义指导下,虚假共犯"不可告人的动机"与犯罪心态的界限会受到模糊,从而平衡现实利益,达到实质正义。The issue of liability attribution of false accomplice discuss that whether a conductor should be responsible for helping or encouraging the offender objectively,yet he does not have mens rea. The key issue is whether the false accomplice has the mens rea of the accomplice.Analysing on American cases, we could find the mens rea of accomplice focused on joint cognitive factors.Under the pragmatism,the boundary of ulterior motives and the mens rea would be fuzzy in order to balance real interests and reach substantial justice.

关 键 词：虚假共犯 犯罪心态 犯罪结果 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]