戴震思想“分期说”评议  

A Commentary on the Stage Division of DAI Zhen's Thought

作　　者：龙鑫[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学哲学系,北京100871

出　　处：《信阳师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2010年第6期85-91,共7页Journal of Xinyang Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：对戴震思想的"分期"研究由来已久,这一研究模式致力于戴震的早期与晚期之间划分出明确的界限,但其结果却形成了"考据学家戴震"与"义理学者戴震"两个难以兼容的形象,为我们理解其学问主旨造成了困难。"分期说"的主要缺陷是立论前提与论据使用的不当。唯有摆脱"分期说",依照"通经以明道"这一贯穿戴震一生的学问路径,我们才能对戴震形成前后一贯的理解。The stage division＇of Dai Zhen＇s thought has been widely accepted. However, this argument placed great obstacles in compre- hending DAI Zhen＇s thought as a coherent system. In section I , the paper argues that the tlivision＇overemphasizes on the differences between Dai Zhen＇s thought in early years and in ＇afterlife, splits Dai Zhen into a philologist and a philosopher, and makes it impossible to comprehend his thought as a whole. The argument in section U shows that the ＂division＂ originated from the conflict between Han- learning and Sung-learning, and missed the consistence of his thought because of inappropriate evidences. In section Ⅲ, this paper in- tends to reveal the consistent topic of Dai Zhen＇s thought, that is to say, to reveal Dao through textual studies of Confucian canons. On- ly based on the study according to the proper text instead of ＂division＇can we comprehend Dai Zhen＇s thought as a coherent system rather than some ideas pieced together.

关 键 词：戴震思想 分期说 分裂 弥合 通经以明道 

分 类 号：K248[历史地理—历史学]