瑕疵行政行为的效力及法律后果论纲  

On the Legal Effect and Consequence of Flawed Administrative Act

作　　者：黄全[1] 陈海[2] 

机构地区：[1]中国民航大学法学院,天津300300 [2]内蒙古师范大学马克思主义学院,呼和浩特010022

出　　处：《四川师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第6期28-34,共7页Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：中央高校科研基金专项"行政行为效力与法律后果研究"(ZXH2010F004)

摘　　要：行政行为的效力包括形式效力与实质效力,两者构成了行政行为的效力体系。严重且明显瑕疵行政行为不具有形式效力的理论与制度混淆了形式效力与实质效力发生的基础。形式效力是基于行政行为的形式而具有的效力,与行政行为内容中的瑕疵无关,瑕疵行政行为都应具有形式效力。实质效力是基于行政行为内容的实质正当而具有的效力,不同的瑕疵将不同程度地影响着行政行为的实质效力并导致该行为被撤销、确认无效与治愈的法律后果。The legal effect of administrative act,consisting of formal effect and substantial effect,form the system of its legal effect.Theory and system of seriously and obviously flawed administrative act being of non-formal effect confuses the foundation for the two categories of effects,of which formal effect is based on the form of the administrative act and not related to the flaw in its content and therefore of formal effect with flaw,while substantial effect is based on the substance of its content and therefore various flaws affect its substantial effect to various extent and lead to the legal consequence of its being annulled,being declared illegal and being redressed.

关 键 词：瑕疵 形式效力 实质效力 法律后果 

分 类 号：D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]