检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中北大学政法学院,山西太原030051 [2]华北电网有限公司唐山供电公司,河北唐山063000
出 处:《华北电力大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第5期66-76,共11页Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences)
摘 要:文章首先通过分析1998年以来德国的三次电力市场改革风潮,证明电力垄断规制中反垄断执法与行业监管的组合是适应电力市场化发展阶段而变化的。进而通过比较得出,中德电力体制在国家责任、竞争程度与垄断性质方面的差异性以及在结构性垄断与垄断规制必要性等方面的共同性,提出我国现阶段的规制模式应该是以电力垄断企业监管为主,重点为竞争打开突破口。最后,结合德国电力市场自由化的经验与教训提出了强化我国电力监管的具体建议。Both China and Germany initiated the Reform to introduce the competition into the power sectors in 1998.While Germany has in the last 12 years already established the liberalized power market,the reform in China was full of twists and turns.The Blame is not only to be put on the differences about the ownership and economic development,but also we should not neglect that it is the missing and misplacing regulations on the power monopolist,that lead to this deadlock.Therefore we should recognize clearly the extent of competition and the nature of monopoly on in our power sector,and come up with the workable concept about the regulation in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28