检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]司法部司法鉴定科学技术研究所上海市法医学重点实验室,上海200063
出 处:《中国司法鉴定》2010年第6期47-50,共4页Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(81001354)
摘 要:近年来,道路交通事故频繁发生,造成严重的人身伤害。许多颅脑损伤患者伤后常出现明显的行为或认知缺陷,创伤性脑损伤患者精神障碍的患病率明显增高,精神伤残的评定日益增多。但同时,关于精神伤残评定的争议也日益激烈。首先介绍国内外精神伤残的相关概念,然后分析道路交通事故精神伤残评定标准存在的不足和缺陷,重点分析道路交通事故中精神伤残程度的影响因素,并介绍精神伤残评定中的检查方法,最后提出解决精神伤残评定分歧的思路。In recent years, traffic accidents occur frequently and often result in serious body impairment. Many brain-injured patients have obvious behavior or cognitive disorders. Mental disorder rate due to traumatic brain injury have been increasing significantly, and cases of forensic psychiatric disability evaluation of such disorders are on rise. At the same time, there exist serious disputes about psychiatric disability evaluation. In the paper, the concepts related to psychiatric disability are introduced, the present psychiatric disability evaluation rules or guides are discussed, and factors influencing psychiatric disability in traffic accidents are analyzed. The relevant clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques are also introduced. Proposals on resolving disagreements in psychiatric disability evaluation are put forward.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28