检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《肿瘤预防与治疗》2010年第1期49-52,共4页Journal of Cancer Control And Treatment
摘 要:目的:探讨LPT液基细胞薄片技术在淋巴结穿刺标本中的诊断应用价值。方法:利用利普(LiquidPrep Test,LPT)液基细胞薄片技术和传统制片技术对310例淋巴结肿大的细针穿刺标本进行对比分析。从涂片的细胞量,细胞形态结构,涂片背景等方面进行比较。结果:在涂片质量方面,LPT液基细胞薄片优于传统涂片组,但两种检查方法的结果无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:LPT液基薄片细胞制片在细胞量、细胞形态保存和涂片背景清晰方面优于传统涂片,有助于提高病理医师阅片的快速性和准确性。传统涂片细胞核结构较清晰。两者结合应用,有助于提高淋巴结病变诊断的准确性。Objective: To investigate the diagnosing value of Liqui-prep Test(LPT) in fine needle aspiration of lymph node. Methods: 310 smears of aspirated lymph node samples made by LFF and conventional smear technique were compared in cell quantity, cell morphology, structure and background. Results: There was no significant difference of smear quality between LPT group and the conventional group( P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion: LPT is superior to conventional smear technique in cell quantity, cell morphology and background, but inferior in the nucleus structure. It would contribute to improve the diagnosis efficiency in fine needle aspiraton of lymph node when LPT is combined with conventional smear technique.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28