检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京财经大学营销与物流学院,南京210007 [2]上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院,上海200052
出 处:《系统管理学报》2010年第5期497-502,共6页Journal of Systems & Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70602023)
摘 要:回收旧产品用于产品再生产已经成为许多制造商的选择,制造商可以选择第三方回收渠道、直接回收渠道、间接回收渠道等三类回收渠道。针对由强势零售商和弱势零售商组成的间接回收渠道,讨论了产品完全回收、产品销售和旧产品回收的决策独立模式下的闭环渠道的定价决策与渠道协调问题。首先提出模型假设,分析了无逆向渠道的价格决策问题;然后,对环形渠道的价格决策与渠道协调进行探讨,并将研究结果与无逆向渠道的决策结果进行比较。研究表明,制造商的产品回收补贴对批发价格、零售价格和零售商的销量不产生影响,但会显著提高2个零售商的利润水平,在制造商的产品回收补贴足够低的情况下,也能提高制造商的利润水平。Product remanufacturing has been recognized by many manufacturers.Manufacturer can adopts one of three product take-back systems including the third party take-back channel,direct take-back channel and indirect take-back channel.In allusion to the indirect take-back channel made up of one dominant retailer and one weak retailer,the paper discusses the pricing decision and channel coordination of closed-loop channel under the mode of taking back products totally and the independent relationship between product sale decision and used product returning decision.Firstly,it proposes some model suppositions.In succession,it analyzes the pricing decision under no reverse channel.Then,it discusses the pricing decision and channel coordination of closed-loop channel,and compares the research results with the decision results under no reverse channel.The results show that the manufacturer's buying-back price has no effect on wholesale price,retail price and sales scale,but it improves the profit level of two retailers evidently,and it can improve the profit level of manufacturer if it is low enough.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.71