国际体育组织规章的法律性质及其在中国的适用问题  

Issues about the legal nature of the regulations of international sport organizations and their application in China

作　　者：裴洋[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875

出　　处：《体育学刊》2010年第11期20-25,共6页Journal of Physical Education

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"职业体育联盟法律规制研究"(07JC820034)

摘　　要：对于国际体育组织规章的法律性质,国内观点有国际习惯说、其他国际法渊源说、国际惯例说和合同说等不同观点。但国际体育组织规章因其在实践中的作用及影响力的不同,不能一概而论。《世界反兴奋剂规则》和"奥运停战"已成了国际习惯,大多数国际体育组织规章属于国际惯例,《奥林匹克宪章》等其他的国际体育组织规章则仅具有合同性质。作为国际惯例的国际体育组织规章可在中国法院得到直接适用,属于涉外合同性质的国际体育组织规章,则必须由法院依据可适用的法律来判断其有效性。About the legal nature of the regulations of international sports organizations, Chinese scholars have different views, such as the international custom theory, the other sources of the international law theory, the interna- tional practices theory, and the contract theory. However, since the functions and influences of the regulations of international sports organizations in practice are different, their legal nature can not be generalized. The World Anti-Doping Code and the Olympic Truce have become international customs; most of the regulations of international sports organizations are international practices; other regulations of international sports organizations, such as the Olympic Charter, are provided only with the contract nature. Those regulations of international sports organizations that are used as international practices can be directly applied in courts in China, while the validity of those regulations of international sports organizations that have a foreign contract attribute must be determined by courts according to applicable laws.

关 键 词：体育法 国际体育组织规章 奥林匹克宪章 世界反兴奋剂规则 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]