论学术抄袭的两面性:以学术规范和法律规范的区分为视角  

Discussion of the Dual Character of Plagiarism:From the Angle of Distinction of Academic Norms and Legal Norm

作　　者：齐爱民[1] 周伟萌[1] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400044

出　　处：《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第6期86-92,共7页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：重庆大学中央高校基本科研业务费科研专项人文社会科学类重大项目"我国信息资源开发利用的法律战略与对策"

摘　　要：抄袭作为一种典型的学术腐败行为,不仅违反了学术道德规范,同时还违反了著作权法,并侵犯了他人的著作权。但是学术抄袭的认定标准与著作权侵权的认定标准不一致,国内学术界需要建立完善的学术道德规范与学术抄袭审查机制。学术抄袭的治理则需要司法机关、学术界与行政机构的共同参与。Plagiarism is a kind of typical academic corruption. It is not only a violation of academic ethics and academic norms but also a violation of the copyright. The identification standard of academic plagiarism is different from the identification standard of copyright infringement. The Chinese academic community needs to establish and perfect the academic norms and review mechanism of academic plagiarism. The management of academic plagiarism requires the mutual efforts of judicial organizations, academic institutions and administrative agencies.

关 键 词：学术抄袭 学术规范 著作权侵权 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]