知识诚信与知识产权:学术不端法律调整的理论思考  

Intellectual Integrity and Intellectual Property:Theoretical Thoughts about Legal Regulation on Academic Misconduct

作　　者：张小强[1] 卓光俊[2] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400044 [2]重庆大学文学与新闻传媒学院,重庆400044

出　　处：《重庆大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第6期99-106,共8页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费(CDJSK100004)

摘　　要：学术不端的行为主体——知识创造和传播主体应享受的学术自由和学术领域的自治要求使得法律调整学术不端时只能限制于程序领域而不能判断具体学术问题,否则便是干涉了学术自由。学术不端与知识产权侵权没有必然联系表明知识产权法虽然能够调整部分学术不端行为,但是受到很大局限。通过分析知识诚信与知识产权的联系与区别,揭示了法律不能有效调整学术不端行为的根源。The law should regulate procedure issues but not substantial issues of academic misconducts because people engaging in academic careers and in intellectual production and communication, should have freedom and autonomy in academic fields. If not so, outside factors intervene in the academic freedom. Academic misconduct is not always affiliated with intellectual infringement. This shows that intellectual property law can regulate some kinds of academic misconducts, but intellectual property law is limited in this field. By analyzing the sameness and difference between intellectual integrity and intellectual property, the origin of the limits of law while regulating academic misconducts is given.

关 键 词：知识诚信 知识产权 学术不端 法律调整 著作权 

分 类 号：G322[文化科学]