检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙爱华[1]
机构地区:[1]苏州农业职业技术学院思政教研室,江苏苏州215008
出 处:《安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版)》2010年第6期59-64,共6页Journal of Anhui Agricultural University:SOC.SCI.
摘 要:随着社会的发展,行政自由裁量权的合理、适度行使对法治有重要的促进和保障作用,但是行政自由裁量权在现代国家权力中的扩张使其在运行中带来了一些负面效应,必须加以控制。行政程序为行政行为设置一种安全的运行模式,使得行政过程公开,公正,合理;并且通过相对人程序性参与,保持行政权力与相对人权利的平衡,限制行政行为的恣意、专断。为了发挥行政程序的有效作用,通过对我国行政程序立法现状的分析,研究得出行政程序立法必须摒弃"重实体,轻程序"的传统观念,树立"程序正义"的立法理念,尽快制定一部统一的行政程序法。With the social development, reasonable and moderate exercise of administrative discretion plays an important role in promoting and safeguarding rules of law. However, the expansion of administrative discretion in the modern state power has brought some negative effects during its operation, which must be controlled. Administrative procedures set up a safe operation mode for administrative behavior to make its process open, fair and reasonable, and keep a balance of administrative power and counterpart rights and restrict the arbitrary of administrative behavior through counterpart' s procedural involvement. In order to play the effective role of administrative procedures, based on the analysis of the current legislation of the administrative procedure, the paper comes to the conclusion that the administrative procedure legislation must abandon the traditional concept of "substantiality overweighing process", establish the legislation idea of "procedural justice" and formulate a unified administrative procedural law as soon as possible.
分 类 号:D912.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15