检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽省皮肤病防治所,安徽合肥230031 [2]无为县皮肤病防治所,安徽无为238300 [3]明光市四山村麻风病院,安徽明光239400 [4]淮南市马山医院,安徽淮南232001
出 处:《安徽预防医学杂志》2010年第2期102-103,共2页Anhui Journal of Preventive Medicine
摘 要:目的比较安徽省实施可疑线索报告筛查前后早期发现麻风病人的效果,为控制麻风病提供依据。方法运用急性弛缓性麻痹监测的方法,对麻风病可疑线索进行监测。结果实施可疑线索报告筛查后2年,麻风病平均发现率为0.05/10万,较实施前2年的0.0375/10万明显增长(2χ=17.85,P<0.01),平均延迟期较前2年缩短了2.3个月,各早发现指标均有明显改进。结论在麻风低流行地区实施可疑线索报告筛查工作可有效提高麻风病病例发现效果。Objective To compare the effect of early detection of leprosy cases before reporting and screening of cases with Acute flaccid paralysis(AFP) Method with one after doing,and provide reference for controlling leprosy.Methods The AFP Case Surveillance method was used for tracking suspected clues of leprosy.Results After report and screening of cases with AFP for 2 years,the average detection rate was 0.05/lakh,was remarkably higher than that 2 years ago(0.0375/lakh),and there was significant difference(χ2=17.85,P0.01).Be compared with the situation 2 years ago,the average detection time has been shortened by 2.3 months,and all indexes were significantly improved.Conclusion Reporting and screening of suspected clues of leprosy in a low epidemic area could improve the effect of detection of leprosy cases.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.242.216