检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李淑静[1] 李登武[1] 秦廷松[1] 刘雨[2]
机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学林学院,陕西杨凌712100 [2]西北农林科技大学生命科学学院,陕西杨凌712100
出 处:《武汉植物学研究》2010年第5期583-588,共6页Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research
基 金:西北农林科技大学青年学术骨干支持计划(01140304)
摘 要:研究了白皮松林林隙物种组成和种间关系在林隙发育的各个阶段的动态变化,并对林隙内主要树种的更新反应进行了探讨。结果表明,在发育阶段为前期、中前期、中后期和后期的序列上,林隙中乔木层优势度最大的物种分别是白皮松(Pinus bungeana)、辽东栎(Quercus wutaishanica)、山桃(Prunus davidiana)和侧柏(Platy-cladus orientalis);灌木层优势种包括白莲蒿(Artemisia gmelinii)、胡枝子(Lespedeza bicolor)、薄皮木(Lepto-dermis oblonga)和狼牙刺(Sophora viciifolia);草本层优势种包括大披针苔草(Carex lanceolata)、糙隐子草(Cleistogenes squarrosa)、紫菀(Aster tataricus)和荩草(Arthraxon hispidus);非林隙林分的优势种不明显。在林隙发育过程中乔木层、灌木层、草本层的平均相似性系数为0.32、0.38和0.27。可见林隙发育过程中群落各层次的相似性系数由小到大顺序为:草本<乔木<灌木;草本植物随着林隙环境条件的改变而出现较大的消亡和更新,显示出较大的波动性;乔木的稳定性和连续性介于灌木和草本之间。依据林隙中树种幼苗、幼树Ⅰ和幼树Ⅱ的数量差异,可将林隙更新反应分为单峰型、双峰型、差异不明显3种,并分别以白皮松、辽东栎和油松(Pinus tabu-laeformis)为代表树种。Species composition dynamics and correlation coefficients of species in each layer were studied and the regeneration response of the major tree species were examined among developmental stages of gaps in Pinus bungeana forest in Huanglong mountain,Shaanxi Province.Along the gap developmental series of prophase,pro-metaphase,after-metaphase,and anaphase,the dominant species in the arbor layer were Pinus bungeana,Quercus wutaishanica,Prunus davidiana,and Platycladus orientalis.The dominant species in the shrub layer were Artemisia gmelinii,Lespedeza bicolor,Leptodermis oblonga,and Sophora viciifolia,while the dominant species in the herb layer were Carex lanceolata,Cleistogenes squarrosa,Aster tataricus,and Arthraxon hispidus.In the non-gap stands,there were no dominant species.The simi-larity coefficients of trees,shrubs,and herb species with different gap stages were 0.32,0.38,and 0.27,respectively,while the composition of herb species fluctuated greatly.The regeneration responses could be classified into unimodal curve type,double-modal curve type,no significant response type 3 groups according to quantitative dynamics of the seedlings,saplingⅠand saplingⅡin the different gap stages,to Pinus bungeana,Quercus wutaishanica,and Pinus tabulaeformis as representatives.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40