机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第二医院急诊科,广州510120 [2]中山大学公共卫生学院 [3]建省急救中心 [4]广州市急救医疗指挥中心 [5]海口市120急救中心 [6]青海省医疗紧急救援中心 [7]天津市急救中心 [8]武汉市急救中心 [9]重庆市急救医疗中心 [10]中山市急救中心
出 处:《中华急诊医学杂志》2010年第11期1130-1136,共7页Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
基 金:卫生部临床重点项目(2007-353);中山大学5010项目(2007019)
摘 要:目的 调查我国大中城市院前急救患者流行病学情况,探讨院前急救病例特点.方法 从我国8个大中城市急救中心系统数据库中导出2008年度全部数据,就其有完整记录的资料进行统计分析.结果 (1)院前急救组调度时间、到达时间、现场时间、返回时间、出车总时间、急救半径分别为(2.16±1.10)min,(14.01±6.82)min,(12.12±5.96)min,(14.08±6.85)min,(42.34±20.21)min和(8.50±4.18)km,院前非死亡组分别为(2.19±1.13)min,(14.15±7.14)min,(11.60±6.72)min,(14.92±6.89)min,(41.86±19.53)min和(8.63±4.31)km,院前死亡组分别为(2.10±1.08)min,(13.68±7.14)min,(25.25±12.34)min,(13.75±6.48)min,(54.74±25.47)min和(7.86±3.91)km,院前非心脏性猝死组分别为(2.09±1.03)min,(13.58±6.78)min,(25.53±12.34)min,(13.60±6.54)min,(53.79±23.77)min和(7.67±3.86)km,院前心脏性猝死组分别为(2.12±1.02)min,(14.10±7.05)min,(24.79±12.08)min,(13.79±6.61)min,(54.80±25.36)min和(7.90±3.92)km.院前死亡组的调度时间、到达时间、返回时间、急救半径均明显小于院前非死亡组,前组的现场时间、出车总时间均明显大于后者(P<0.05或P<0.01).院前心脏性猝死组的调度时间、返回时间与院前非心脏性猝死组的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但前组的到达时间、出车总时间、急救半径均明显大于后组,而现场时间明显小于后组(P<0.05或P<0.01).(2)院前急救组、院前非死亡组、院前死亡组、院前非心脏性猝死组、院前心脏性猝死组的病例数均以第一季度为最多,其最少时间段分别是4:00-6:00、4:00-6:00、4:00-6:00、22:00-24:00、2:00-4:00,其最多时间段分别是20:00-22:00、20:00-22:00、8:00-10:00、2:00-4:00、8:00-10:00.(3)在241 876例院前急救病例中,创伤类患者是院前急救中最多的,年龄�Objective To investigate the epidemiological information of patients in pre-hospital medical care for our large and medium-sized cities and probe the patients' characteristic. Method The data in 2008 were exported from the computer databases of 8 large and medium-sized cities' emergency medical centers in our country.The thorough records of data were conducted to statistical analysis. Results ( 1 ) The scheduling time, running time, rescue time, returning time, total time and service radius in the pre-hospital medical care group were 2.16± 1.10(min), 14.01 ±6.82(min), 12.12±5.96(min), 14.08± 6.85(min), 42.34± 20.21(min)and 8.50±4.18(km), and the above parameter in the non-death group were 2.19 ± 1.13(min), 14.15 ± 7.14(min),11.60±6.72(min), 14.92 ±6.89(min), 41.86± 19.53(minutes) and 8.63±4.31(Km), and the above parameter in the death group were 2.10± 1.08(min), 13.68 ± 7.14(min), 25.25 ± 12.34(min), 13.75±6.48(min), 54.74 ± 25.47(min) and 7.86± 3.91(Km), and the above parameter in the non-sudden cardiac death group were2.09± 1.03(min), 13.58±6.78(min), 25.53± 12.34(min), 13.60± 6.54(min), 53.79±23.77(min) and 7.67 ± 3.86(Km), and the above parameter in the sudden cardiac death group were 2.12 ±1.02(min), 14.10±7.05(min), 24.79± 12.08(min), 13.79±6.61(min), 54. 80 ± 25. 36( min) and 7.90±3.92(Km) respectively. The scheduling time, running time, returning time and service radius in the death group were less than those of the non-death group, but the rescue time and total time of the former were more than those of the latter respectively ( P 〈 0.05 or P 〈 0. 001 ). The scheduling time and returning time didn' t have significant difference between the sudden cardiac death group and the non-sudden cardiac death group respectively ( P 〉 0.05), but the running time, total time and service radius of the sudden cardiac death group were more than thos
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...