检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学地理科学学院,广东广州510631
出 处:《云南地理环境研究》2010年第5期63-67,87,共6页Yunnan Geographic Environment Research
基 金:广东省软科学研究计划项目(2010B070300072)
摘 要:公交车和地铁是普通市民公园休闲的主要出行方式。通过统计公园500 m范围内的公交线路数和1 km范围内地铁站点数,构建公共交通出行便利度模型,比较分析广州中心城区33个免费公园的出行便利度。结果显示:(1)由于历史区位的原因,免费公园的公共交通出行便利度呈现明显的旧城核心指向特征;(2)公园之间公共交通出行便利度差异显著,公园便利度最高值与最低值之间相差近100倍;(3)综合公园的便利度最高,社区公园次之,专类公园最低;(4)地铁对公园公共交通出行便利度的贡献大于公交车。Bus and metro are the two main mass transits for citizens to go to parks.In order to analyze the travel convenience of 33 free parks in Guangzhou 7 central districts,public travel convenience model was build based on the number of bus routes in 500 m and metro stations in 1km.Findings showed that first,due to the historical location,the convenience presented old core districts pointed characters;second,there were big differences of travel convenience among free parks;third,the travel convenience of comprehensive parks was the highest followed by community parks,the travel convenience of the professional parks was the lowest;fourth,it displayed that the role of metro was more important than bus for travel convenience.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.19.244.116