检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广州市第一人民医院耳鼻咽喉科,广州510180
出 处:《医学综述》2010年第22期3502-3503,共2页Medical Recapitulate
摘 要:目的评价舌下尘疫苗螨疫苗治疗变应性鼻炎的疗效及安全性。方法采用单纯舌下尘螨含服(38例)与舌下尘螨疫苗含服配合药物治疗(38例)对比的方法,对76例尘螨过敏的变应性鼻炎患者进行了6个月的临床观察。结果治疗后两组患者的症状和体征评分与治疗前比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。单纯舌下含服组总有效率为63.16%,综合治疗组总有效率为86.84%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论舌下含服尘螨疫苗治疗变应性鼻炎疗效好,且早期配合药物对症治疗能提高患者的依从性。Objective To evaluate of the efficacy and safety of sublingual immunotherapy dust mite allergic rhinitis vaccine.Methods Using a simple dust mite sublingual(n= 38)and sublingual vaccine containing dust mites with drug treatment(n=38)were compared,whereas 76 patients allergic to dust mite allergic rhinitis patients were observed in a 6-month clinical stduy.Results In the two groups,the dust mite allergic rhinitis symptoms after treatment than before treatment were significantly improved(P0.05).The effective rate of the simple sublingual treatment was 63.16% and that of the combined treatment was 86.84%(P0.05).Conclusion For dust mite sublingual vaccine for allergic rhinitis,the combined therapy was better than the sublingual vaccine.Early symptomatic medical treatment can improve the patient compliance.
分 类 号:R765.21[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.225