检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《现代预防医学》2010年第23期4556-4557,共2页Modern Preventive Medicine
摘 要:[目的]探讨帕罗西汀联用黛立新治疗初诊抑郁症患者的疗效及安全性。[方法]将48例初诊抑郁症患者随机分为研究组(帕罗西汀联用黛立新)和对照组(帕罗西汀)各24例,治疗6周。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和不良反应量表(TESS)在治疗前和治疗后1、2、4、6周末进行疗效及副反应评价。[结果]帕罗西汀联用黛立新组总有效率(91.7%)明显高于对照组(62.5%),差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05);两组HAMD评分比较,第1周末开始研究组明显低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05);两组TESS总分比较,治疗后1周末对照组明显高于研究组,差异有统计学意义(P﹤0.05),其余时期差异无统计学意义(P﹥0.05)。[结论]帕罗西汀联用黛立新治疗抑郁症有较好疗效,起效快,安全性好。[Objective]To explore the efficacy and safety of Deanxit combined with paroxetine treatment in newly diagnosed depression patients.[Methods]48 patients newly diagnosed with depression were randomly divided into study group(paroxetine combined with Deanxit)and control group(paroxetine),who were treated for 6 weeks.Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression(HAMD)and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale(TESS)were used before treatment and 1st,2nd,4th,6th weekend after treatment to evaluate the efficacy and side effects.[Results]The total effective rate in study group(paroxetine combined with Deanxit)was 91.7%,which was significantly higher than that in control group(62.5%),the difference was statistically significant(P﹤0.05);HAMD scores at the 1st weekend between the two groups,which in study group was significantly lower in the control group,the difference was statistically significant(P﹤0.05);TESS scores at the 1st weekend after treatment between the two groups,which in the control group was significantly higher than 1 week study group,the difference was statistically significant(P﹤0.05),the differences in the rest periods were not statistically significances(P﹥0.05).[Conclusion]Paroxetine combined with Deanxit treatment for depression has a good effect,fast onset,good security.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3