物权债权区分理论的再证成  

Reconsideration on the Division Theory of Forderungsrechte and Sachenrechte

作　　者：温世扬[1] 武亦文[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院

出　　处：《法学家》2010年第6期35-45,共11页The Jurist

摘　　要：传统的物权债权区分理论遭遇现代性困境,物债区分相对性理论应景而生。解读方法存在问题,并不当然地表明解读对象本身也存在生存危机。物权债权仍然是两种彼此独立、明确界分的财产权利,但须理清方法逻辑,而不必弱化后作为权宜之计,或者彻底否定后推倒重来。物债区分的真正基础不在于绝对权和相对权的区别,而是支配权和请求权的划分。物债区分是财产权的基本而非周延性分类。所谓的"债权物权化"和"物权债权化"的诸种例证皆可以在物权债权相互区分的体系中找到应有的定位。Along with the development of the society,the Division Theory of Forderungsrechte and Sachenrechte in modern times is questioned to be out-of-time,obsolete,and should be replaced by new approaches,like the Theory of the Weakness of the Dualistic Structure.But the crisis of the dualistic structure is from the wrong way of interpretation,and the traditional property system is still available nowadays.The substantial difference between Sachenrecht and Schuldrecht is the form of right:Sachenrecht is right of dominion,while Schuldrecht is right of claim.The dichotomy in the traditional system does not mean to include all the property rights in reality,and that is the reason many new kinds of rights is odd if brought into the traditional system.The instance of the creditlized real-right and the real-rightlized credit could be located in the dualistic structure made up of Sachenrecht-Schuldrecht in proper interpreting way.

关 键 词：物权债权区分理论 物债区分相对性 债权物权化 物权债权化 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学]