检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李鼎楚[1]
出 处:《湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2010年第6期125-129,共5页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences
基 金:2008年度湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目"清末司法独立研究"(08YBB068)
摘 要:解读"司法独立"不能只囿于宪政理论下的一种理念与原则,它也实际地被表达为政治权力调整中一种具体制度与事件运动。在清末地方司法独立制度构建中,清廷与督抚,在共同认同立宪的背景下,为何对待司法独立问题却旨趣相反?属于督抚之列的袁世凯提倡司法独立,难道不怕自己固有的权力被削弱吗?以当局者的阶层意识与角色扮演来分析这些疑团,发现一种"权力争斗"而非"权力对抗"的倾向不利于司法独立建构。The interpretation on the judicial independence shouldn't only be limited in a conception and a principle,but also be reflected as a concrete system and movement in the process of the regulating to political power.In the background of approving constitutionalism,why did the Qing government and magistracies look on the judicial independence in contrast in the process of building local judicial independence of late Qing dynasty? As magistracy,Yuan Shi-kai who advocated judicial independence which afraid that his inherent power would be weaken? With the authorities' class-consciousness and role-play to analyze these riddles,we'll find a tendency of power struggle rather than power confrontation,which is harm for building of judicial independence.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.26