程颐《春秋》佚说考述  

On Cheng Yi's Lost Chunqiu Doctrines

作　　者：黄觉弘[1] 

机构地区：[1]江汉大学人文学院,湖北武汉430056

出　　处：《武汉理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2010年第6期932-936,共5页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金项目资助课题(20080431111)

摘　　要：今论程颐《春秋》之学者所用材料向不出《二程集》之范围。考李明复《春秋集义》对程颐《春秋》说的征引极为详尽,多达300余条,绝大多数原文见于《二程集》,但其中有16条原文逸出《二程集》之外,当系程颐的《春秋》佚说。这16条佚说是研究程颐其学的新材料。其中有9条,在《二程集》有类似的说法,甚或文辞亦有相近者,这可能是因为同出程颐一源,而门人弟子各记所闻,所述互有异同。其他7条佚说,在《二程集》中都找不到类似的说法,这对程颐乃至宋代《春秋》学的研究而言,更可谓弥足珍贵,意义尤其重要。Today＇s researchers study on Cheng Yi＇s Chunqiu theory, the materials used in the Ercheng Ji. Li Ming-fu＇s Chunqiu Jiyi quoted Cheng Yi＇s chunqiu doctrines very detailedly, up to more than 300, the vast majority of the original in the Ercheng Ji. ,but 16 of them are excluded by the original Ercheng Ji. it should be Cheng Yi＇s lost doctrines. These doctrines are new materials. Among them, nine in the Ercheng Ji. have similar arguments,and even have similar dictions,and this may be due to a source with Cheng Yi ,the students record their own disciples,described differently. Othcr seven can not find a similar argument in the Ercheng Ji. ,which are more valuable for the significance of particular importance. In addition, the Chunqiu Jiyi quoted Cheng Yi in several articles and the Ercheng Ji. are discrepancies between the text.

关 键 词：程颐 《春秋》 《二程集》 《春秋集义》 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学] K244[历史地理—历史学]