醉酒驾驶之定性研究  

On the Judgment of Drunk Driving

作　　者：吴亚安[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院,上海200240

出　　处：《四川理工学院学报（社会科学版）》2010年第6期35-40,共6页Journal of Sichuan University of Science & Engineering(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：学界对于醉酒驾驶的主观方面认定争论不休,其根源在于我国《刑法》对于醉酒者的刑事责任承担规定过于粗陋。原因自由行为归责理论之间接正犯说认为,判断原因自由行为的罪过只需认定原因行为的主观状态。醉酒驾驶行为的主观方面应当统一是过失,即一般醉酒驾驶行为者在饮酒时对于危害后果的意志因素都是持反对态度,而不是不希望也不反对的态度,故而属于过失。因而对醉驾应当继续保持二元化惩罚,未达犯罪标准的行为无须入罪,可采用行政处罚;已达犯罪标准者则以交通肇事罪处罚。There has been a long-term controversy over the subjective fault of drunk driving, which is caused by the imperfect provision of driving while intoxicated in criminal law. The s that in advance act. The fault of drunk driving crime is negligent, because trator＇s wish, who should never wish this result happened When he drinks ubjective fault the dangerous of the whole act is decided by result goes against the perpedriving which reach the standard of crime should be criminated as Traffic Offence, while the other unlawful acts of drunk driving should be regulated by administrative law.

关 键 词：醉酒驾驶 原因自由行为 故意 过失 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]